Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

May 15 2017


@PollyTickal: There's something you're not hearing about. The Dems are not actually democratic. They said so in court. Why does MSM ignore?

November 16 2014


December 29 2012

The sailors allege a host of medical conditions, from headaches and difficulty concentrating to rectal bleeding and thyroid problems, as a result of the exposure and say they will have to undergo more medical tests and expensive treatments in the future, their lawyer Paul Garner said Thursday. The sailors also want TEPCO, which has an office in Washington, D.C., to establish a $100 million fund to pay for any of their future medical expenses. ...About half of the sailors involved in the suit are active duty, while the others have separated, Garner said. He said they are not just looking for money. ‘No amount of money would compensate me if I’m 23 years old and I’m bleeding from my [behind] or have thyroid problems,’ he said. He added it was about getting justice for people who rushed to aid Japan in its time of need.
US sailors sue Japanese utility over radiation exposure (Stars and Stripes, Dec. 27 2012)

October 28 2012


The Legal Battle Between Apple and Samsung (VOA Learning English via YouTube, Oct 2 2012)

This is the VOA Special English Technology Report.

Samsung Electronics won a case in its battle with the American technology company Apple over property rights. A court in Japan ruled in a case involving Samsung's Galaxy series of smartphones and tablet computers.

A three-judge panel in Tokyo said the products did not violate an Apple patent for organizing music and video on several devices. The court also ordered Apple to pay all legal costs related to the case. A patent is a property right given by a government. It keeps others from making, using or selling an invention without the permission of the patent owner.

But, the case in Japan is just one of many in the worldwide legal battle between Apple and Samsung. In August, a jury in California found Samsung guilty of willfully violating several of Apple's patents. The jury ordered the South Korean company to pay Apple more than $1 billion.

The patents include so-called utility patents for Apple's "pinch to zoom" and "tap to zoom" technology. They let users change the way things appear on the screen of their device. Included are design patents on the look and shape of the iPhone.

Madhavi Sunder is a law professor at the University of California, Davis. She has also written a book called "From Goods to a Good Life: Intellectual Property and Global Justice." She says issues involving design patents are complex. Madhavi Sunder says patents are meant to increase competition and support design and development. She sees a problem with Apple trying to say its designs are something only one company can have.

She adds: "It raises the real question of whether or not we should be protecting designs with patents in the first place." Madhavi Sunder says Apple built its computer company using the same methods that it is now opposing. Apple appears to be saying that no one else can use its methods. Madhavi Sunder says, "This goes to the heart of what innovation is about."

Samsung said the California court's decision, in its words, "should not be viewed as a win for Apple, but as a loss for American consumers." And the company told its employees that it would continue to fight until its arguments are accepted.

But the dispute is far from over. On the day of the California ruling, a court in South Korea ruled that Apple and Samsung had violated each other's patents.

For VOA Learning English, I'm Laurel Bowman.

Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!